THE INFLUENCE OF ACADEMIC PRESSURE, OPPORTUNITY OF CHEATING AND RATIONALIZATION OF CHEATING ON THE BEHAVIOR OF ACADEMIC CHEATING WITH PERCEPTION OF ACCOUNTING ETHICS AS A MODERATING VARIABLE (ON STIE SUTAATMADJA SUBANG ACCOUNTING STUDENTS)

  • Vina Nur Alviani STIE Sutaatmadja
  • Asep Kurniawan STIE Sutaatmadja
  • Bambang Sugiharto STIE Sutaatmadja
Keywords: academic pressure, opportunity of cheating and rationalization of cheating, perception of accounting ethics, behavior of academic cheating

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of fraud triangle (academic pressure, opportunity of cheating and rationalization of cheating) to have  positive effect on the behavior of academic cheating with the perception of accounting ethics as a moderating variable on STIE Sutaatmadja Subang accounting students.

The population in this study were students of accounting department of STIE Sutaatmadja Subang generetions 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 as many as 215 students. To determinate the size of the sample using slovin formula and the result is 140 sample students. Sample selection technique using probability sampling while for sampling in this study is using simple random sampling. The dependent variable of behavior of academic cheating. The independent variables are academic pressure, opportunity of cheating and rationalization of cheating. And one moderating variable of perception of accounting ethics. The methods of data analysis is using descriptive statistic and inferential statistic.

The result showed that academic pressure had a significant negative effect on behavior toward academic cheating, opportunity of cheating and rationalization of cheating had a significant positive effect on the behavior of academic cheating and the perception of accounting ethics did not moderate academic pressure, opportunity of cheating and rationalization of cheating on behavior of academic cheating.

References

Buku

Albrecht, W.Steve., et al. 2014. Akuntansi Forensik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Brooks, Leonard J. dan Dunn Paul. 2014. Etika Bisnis Dan Profesi Untuk Direktur, Eksekutif dan Akuntan Jilid 2. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Ghozali, Imam. 2013. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 21 Update PLS Regresi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Griffin, Ricky.W. dan Ebert, Ronald.J. 2006. Bisnis. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Romney, Marshall.B. dan Steinbart, Paul John. 2015. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Umiyati, Indah. dan Nurmalasari, Nunik. 2016. Statistik Penelitian Pengenalan Aplikasi SPSS dan Eviews. Subang: STIESA Press.

Jurnal , Skripsi dan Tesis

Akbar, andi wahyu. 2017. Skripsi. Pengaruh Konsep Fraud Triangle Dan Islamic Ethics Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik. Universitas Islam Indonesia. Yogyakarta.

Becker, D’Arcy. et al. Using The Business Fraud Triangle To Predict Academic Dishonesty Among Business Students. Academy Of Educational Leadership Journal Volume 10 Number 1 2006. University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.

Fuadi, Maksum. 2016. Skripsi. Determinan Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Semarang Dengan Konsep Fraud Triangle. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Kurniawan, Anon. 2011. Skripsi. Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Psikolog UNNES. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

M, Panggih Pradila. 2016. Skripsi. Analisis Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Dengan Menggunakan Konsep Fraud Diamond Studi Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Sumatera Bagian Selatan. Universitas Lampung.

Murdiansyah, Isnan. et al. 2017. Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Magister Akuntansi Universitas Brawijaya). Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual Volume 4 Nomor 2 Juni 2017. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.

Novitasari, Dwi. 2016. Skripsi. Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosional, Persepsi Tekanan Etis, Dan Muatan Etika Dalam Pengajaran Akuntansi Terhadap Persepsi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi (Studi Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi FE UNY). Universitas negeri Yogyakarta.

Nursani, Rahmalia. dan Irianto, Gugus. Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Dimensi Fraud Diamond. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.

Pamungkas, Desiana Dwi. 2015. Skripsi. Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Dalam Dimensi Fraud Triangle Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Siswa Kelas XI Akuntansi SMK Negeri Tempel Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Purnamasari, Dian. dan Irianto, Gugus. Analisis Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Pada Saat Ujian Dan Metode Pencegahannya. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.

Saidina, Desi Ananda. et al. Faktro-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Dalam Perspektif Fraud Triangle Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Islam Malang. Universtias Islam Malang. Malang

Santoso, Dyon. dan Yanti, Harti Budi. Pengaruh Perilaku Tidak Jujur Dan Kompetensi Moral Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Universitas Trisakti.

Singhapkadi, Anusorn., et al. 1994. A Cross-Cultural Study Of Moral Philosophies, Ethica Perceptions And Judgements. USA.

Widowati, Amerti Irvin. dan Indudewi, Dian. Variabel Demografi dan Perilaku Ketidakjujuran Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Universitas Semarang.

Berita

https://www.kompasiana.com/anna_rangkuti/kecurangan-akademik-pada-mahasiswa-kependidikan_5510bfb5a33311c339ba8bca (diakses pada tanggal 02 oktober 2017 pukul 19:31 WIB)

https://news.okezone.com/read/2009/05/29/65/224304/dosen-mahasiswa-itb-bahas-kecurangan-akademik (diakses pada tanggal 02 oktober 2017 pukul 19:31 WIB)

Published
2019-07-12
Section
Table of Contents

Most read articles by the same author(s)